Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 07:08

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
King Charles Shares Super Rare Photo With Late Father Prince Philip - AOL.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Proposed NASA cuts to space science: “Staggering” - EarthSky
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Feather-legged lace weaver spider kills prey by covering it with toxic silk - Phys.org
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
How Many Burgers Are Too Many Burgers? Here's What Health Experts Advise. - HuffPost
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Is it possible for doctors to diagnose prostate cancer just by looking at a patient?